Some checks failed
CI / lint-typecheck (pull_request) Failing after 4m50s
CI / tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / contract-tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / e2e-tests (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / comment-pr (pull_request) Has been skipped
CI / commit-types (pull_request) Has been skipped
240 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
240 lines
8.4 KiB
Markdown
# Rating Integration Tests
|
|
|
|
This directory contains integration tests for the GridPilot Rating system, following the clean integration strategy defined in [`plans/clean_integration_strategy.md`](../../plans/clean_integration_strategy.md).
|
|
|
|
## Testing Philosophy
|
|
|
|
These tests focus on **Use Case orchestration** - verifying that Use Cases correctly interact with their Ports (Repositories, Event Publishers, etc.) using In-Memory adapters for fast, deterministic testing.
|
|
|
|
### Key Principles
|
|
|
|
1. **Business Logic Only**: Tests verify business logic orchestration, NOT UI rendering
|
|
2. **In-Memory Adapters**: Use In-Memory adapters for speed and determinism
|
|
3. **Zero Implementation**: These are placeholders - no actual test logic implemented
|
|
4. **Use Case Focus**: Tests verify Use Case interactions with Ports
|
|
5. **Orchestration Patterns**: Tests follow Given/When/Then patterns for business logic
|
|
|
|
## Test Files
|
|
|
|
### Core Rating Functionality
|
|
|
|
- **[`rating-calculation-use-cases.integration.test.ts`](./rating-calculation-use-cases.integration.test.ts)**
|
|
- Tests for rating calculation use cases
|
|
- Covers: `CalculateRatingUseCase`, `UpdateRatingUseCase`, `GetRatingUseCase`, etc.
|
|
- Focus: Verifies rating calculation logic with In-Memory adapters
|
|
|
|
- **[`rating-persistence-use-cases.integration.test.ts`](./rating-persistence-use-cases.integration.test.ts)**
|
|
- Tests for rating persistence use cases
|
|
- Covers: `SaveRatingUseCase`, `GetRatingHistoryUseCase`, `GetRatingTrendUseCase`, etc.
|
|
- Focus: Verifies rating data persistence and retrieval
|
|
|
|
- **[`rating-leaderboard-use-cases.integration.test.ts`](./rating-leaderboard-use-cases.integration.test.ts)**
|
|
- Tests for rating-based leaderboard use cases
|
|
- Covers: `GetRatingLeaderboardUseCase`, `GetRatingPercentileUseCase`, `GetRatingComparisonUseCase`, etc.
|
|
- Focus: Verifies leaderboard orchestration with In-Memory adapters
|
|
|
|
### Advanced Rating Functionality
|
|
|
|
- **[`rating-team-contribution-use-cases.integration.test.ts`](./rating-team-contribution-use-cases.integration.test.ts)**
|
|
- Tests for team contribution rating use cases
|
|
- Covers: `CalculateTeamContributionUseCase`, `GetTeamRatingUseCase`, `GetTeamContributionBreakdownUseCase`, etc.
|
|
- Focus: Verifies team rating logic and contribution calculations
|
|
|
|
- **[`rating-consistency-use-cases.integration.test.ts`](./rating-consistency-use-cases.integration.test.ts)**
|
|
- Tests for consistency rating use cases
|
|
- Covers: `CalculateConsistencyUseCase`, `GetConsistencyScoreUseCase`, `GetConsistencyTrendUseCase`, etc.
|
|
- Focus: Verifies consistency calculation logic
|
|
|
|
- **[`rating-reliability-use-cases.integration.test.ts`](./rating-reliability-use-cases.integration.test.ts)**
|
|
- Tests for reliability rating use cases
|
|
- Covers: `CalculateReliabilityUseCase`, `GetReliabilityScoreUseCase`, `GetReliabilityTrendUseCase`, etc.
|
|
- Focus: Verifies reliability calculation logic (attendance, DNFs, DNSs)
|
|
|
|
## Test Structure
|
|
|
|
Each test file follows the same structure:
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
describe('Use Case Orchestration', () => {
|
|
let repositories: InMemoryAdapters;
|
|
let useCase: UseCase;
|
|
let eventPublisher: InMemoryEventPublisher;
|
|
|
|
beforeAll(() => {
|
|
// Initialize In-Memory repositories and event publisher
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
// Clear all In-Memory repositories before each test
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('UseCase - Success Path', () => {
|
|
it('should [expected outcome]', async () => {
|
|
// TODO: Implement test
|
|
// Scenario: [description]
|
|
// Given: [setup]
|
|
// When: [action]
|
|
// Then: [expected result]
|
|
// And: [event emission]
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('UseCase - Edge Cases', () => {
|
|
it('should handle [edge case]', async () => {
|
|
// TODO: Implement test
|
|
// Scenario: [description]
|
|
// Given: [setup]
|
|
// When: [action]
|
|
// Then: [expected result]
|
|
// And: [event emission]
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('UseCase - Error Handling', () => {
|
|
it('should handle [error case]', async () => {
|
|
// TODO: Implement test
|
|
// Scenario: [description]
|
|
// Given: [setup]
|
|
// When: [action]
|
|
// Then: [expected error]
|
|
// And: [event emission]
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
describe('UseCase - Data Orchestration', () => {
|
|
it('should correctly format [data type]', async () => {
|
|
// TODO: Implement test
|
|
// Scenario: [description]
|
|
// Given: [setup]
|
|
// When: [action]
|
|
// Then: [expected data format]
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Implementation Guidelines
|
|
|
|
### When Implementing Tests
|
|
|
|
1. **Initialize In-Memory Adapters**:
|
|
```typescript
|
|
repository = new InMemoryRatingRepository();
|
|
eventPublisher = new InMemoryEventPublisher();
|
|
useCase = new UseCase({ repository, eventPublisher });
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
2. **Clear Repositories Before Each Test**:
|
|
```typescript
|
|
beforeEach(() => {
|
|
repository.clear();
|
|
eventPublisher.clear();
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
3. **Test Orchestration**:
|
|
- Verify Use Case calls the correct repository methods
|
|
- Verify Use Case publishes correct events
|
|
- Verify Use Case returns correct data structure
|
|
- Verify Use Case handles errors appropriately
|
|
|
|
4. **Test Data Format**:
|
|
- Verify rating is calculated correctly
|
|
- Verify rating breakdown is accurate
|
|
- Verify rating updates are applied correctly
|
|
- Verify rating history is maintained
|
|
|
|
### Example Implementation
|
|
|
|
```typescript
|
|
it('should calculate rating after race completion', async () => {
|
|
// Given: A driver with baseline rating
|
|
const driver = Driver.create({ id: 'd1', iracingId: '100', name: 'John Doe', country: 'US' });
|
|
await driverRepository.create(driver);
|
|
|
|
// Given: A completed race with results
|
|
const race = Race.create({
|
|
id: 'r1',
|
|
leagueId: 'l1',
|
|
scheduledAt: new Date(Date.now() - 86400000),
|
|
track: 'Spa',
|
|
car: 'GT3',
|
|
status: 'completed'
|
|
});
|
|
await raceRepository.create(race);
|
|
|
|
const result = Result.create({
|
|
id: 'res1',
|
|
raceId: 'r1',
|
|
driverId: 'd1',
|
|
position: 1,
|
|
lapsCompleted: 20,
|
|
totalTime: 3600,
|
|
fastestLap: 105,
|
|
points: 25,
|
|
incidents: 0,
|
|
startPosition: 1
|
|
});
|
|
await resultRepository.create(result);
|
|
|
|
// When: CalculateRatingUseCase.execute() is called
|
|
const ratingResult = await calculateRatingUseCase.execute({
|
|
driverId: 'd1',
|
|
raceId: 'r1'
|
|
});
|
|
|
|
// Then: The rating should be calculated
|
|
expect(ratingResult.isOk()).toBe(true);
|
|
const rating = ratingResult.unwrap();
|
|
expect(rating.driverId.toString()).toBe('d1');
|
|
expect(rating.rating).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(rating.components).toBeDefined();
|
|
expect(rating.components.resultsStrength).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(rating.components.consistency).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(rating.components.cleanDriving).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(rating.components.racecraft).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(rating.components.reliability).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
expect(rating.components.teamContribution).toBeGreaterThan(0);
|
|
|
|
// And: EventPublisher should emit RatingCalculatedEvent
|
|
expect(eventPublisher.events).toContainEqual(
|
|
expect.objectContaining({ type: 'RatingCalculatedEvent' })
|
|
);
|
|
});
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
## Observations
|
|
|
|
Based on the concept documentation, the rating system is complex with many components:
|
|
|
|
1. **Rating Components**: Results Strength, Consistency, Clean Driving, Racecraft, Reliability, Team Contribution
|
|
2. **Calculation Logic**: Weighted scoring based on multiple factors
|
|
3. **Persistence**: Rating history and trend tracking
|
|
4. **Leaderboards**: Rating-based rankings and comparisons
|
|
5. **Team Integration**: Team contribution scoring
|
|
6. **Transparency**: Clear explanation of rating changes
|
|
|
|
Each test file contains comprehensive test scenarios covering:
|
|
- Success paths
|
|
- Edge cases (small fields, DNFs, DNSs, penalties)
|
|
- Error handling
|
|
- Data orchestration patterns
|
|
- Calculation accuracy
|
|
- Persistence verification
|
|
|
|
## Next Steps
|
|
|
|
1. **Implement Test Logic**: Replace TODO comments with actual test implementations
|
|
2. **Add In-Memory Adapters**: Create In-Memory adapters for all required repositories
|
|
3. **Create Use Cases**: Implement the Use Cases referenced in the tests
|
|
4. **Create Ports**: Implement the Ports (Repositories, Event Publishers, etc.)
|
|
5. **Run Tests**: Execute tests to verify Use Case orchestration
|
|
6. **Refine Tests**: Update tests based on actual implementation details
|
|
|
|
## Related Documentation
|
|
|
|
- [Clean Integration Strategy](../../plans/clean_integration_strategy.md)
|
|
- [Testing Layers](../../docs/TESTING_LAYERS.md)
|
|
- [BDD E2E Tests](../e2e/bdd/rating/)
|
|
- [Rating Concept](../../docs/concept/RATING.md)
|